Obama's poll numbers on the decline

by nikkid, Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:46:49 PM EST

National Poll Numbers:

Rasmussen:

6/22    Obama 49%   McCain 42%  O + 7%
6/23    Obama 49%   McCain 43%  O + 6%
6/24    Obama 49%   McCain 44%  O + 5%
6/25    Obama 49%   McCain 45%  O + 4%

Gallup:

6/22 - 6/24  Obama 45%  McCain 45%  Tie




Tags: gallup, rasmussen, national, poll numbers, obama, mccain, 2008 (all tags)

Display:
Permalink :: 79 Comments :: Post a Comment


Re: Obama's poll numbers on the decline (none / 0)

Hey what about the LA times poll ?

I don't know what to make of that poll.


Educated in a small town Taught to fear Jesus in a small town Used to daydream in that small town Another born romantic that's me.
by lori on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:48:33 PM EST

Re: Obama's poll numbers on the decline (2.00 / 1)

Lori, just wondering what you think about Obama's stance on the DP Supreme Court case today?  I know you are more conservative than most of the folks here, so just trying to get things from your perspective.

I'm conflicted but I can just imagine McCain having a field day on this issue tomorrow if Obama had come out in support of the Court's decision.  The headline would be "Obama opposes death penalty for child rapist," which is surely not a headline I'd want discussed in Ohio.


by Blazers Edge on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:57:08 PM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's poll numbers on the decline (2.00 / 2)

"While the evidence tells me that the death penalty does little to deter crime, I believe there are some crimes _ mass murder, the rape and murder of a child _ so heinous, so beyond the pale, that the community is justified in expressing the full measure of its outrage by meting out the ultimate punishment," Obama wrote in his book "The Audacity of Hope."

- I agree with his position wholeheartedly .

I am not a huge fan of the death penalty , but I believe there should be instances in which it is applicable and i believe these type of situations is one of them.

I have a niece of my own , she is 7 as well and I shudder to think how I would feel if such things happened to her.

I applaud him for his position and you are right if he had taken the opposite stance he would have been in more trouble in the heartland than he is now among some folks.


Educated in a small town Taught to fear Jesus in a small town Used to daydream in that small town Another born romantic that's me.
by lori on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 12:06:53 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's poll numbers on the decline (2.00 / 5)

LOL

A 3 point swing in polls with error margins of 4-6%. That's rich. You also put the lie to your title. The numbers you show from Rasmussen have held at exactly 49%.

Just what was the point of this diary? Did it have some purpose?


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Wed Jun 25, 2008 at 11:49:26 PM EST

Re: Obama's poll numbers on the decline (2.00 / 5)

The diarist has made clear that she will vote for McCain unless Clinton is the VP.


by rfahey22 on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 12:18:01 AM EST
[ Parent ]

the point is: since he captured the nomination (2.00 / 1)

he's moved to the center too quickly and his flip-floppings are taking a toll! People had their hopes for change crushed - he is a regular politician and will do and say anything to get elected! Regular people do not like being lied to!


by suzieg on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 01:20:28 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: the point is: since he captured the nomination (2.00 / 2)

But you never supported Obama, so how could your hopes be crushed?  Oh that's right you speak for all "people"


"In the primary you should vote with your heart, but in the general, you should vote with your head" Hillary's husband
by venician on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 01:31:26 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: the point is: since he captured the nomination (2.00 / 1)

You are so wrong in so many ways that I don't even know where to start. On second thought, you wouldn't be open to any real discussion on this anyway so I think I'll save my time.


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 01:51:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: the point is: since he captured the nomination (none / 0)

Sadly, I think its his standing firm on not drilling offshore that is really what is harming his poll numbers.  I think gas prices are really hurting folks, and they're looking for any relief, even the snake oil McCain is offering.

But I hope I'm wrong.  


John McCain: Healthcare for Kids? In America? No way
by bosdcla14 on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 02:30:59 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's poll numbers on the decline (2.00 / 1)

Bumps fade.

Nothing to see here.


by Reaper0Bot0 on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 12:07:03 AM EST

Re: Obama's poll numbers on the decline (2.00 / 3)

OH GOD EVERYONE PANIC AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH OH JESUS WHAT DO WE DO OH CHRIST OH NO

Oh wait I know, i'll look at the diarist diary history, look at what candidate they supported, stroke my beard and realize why they posted it.

Because they're still bitter. Oh.


by heyhellowhatsnew on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 12:09:32 AM EST

Re: Obama's poll numbers on the decline (2.00 / 3)

PUMA!!!!


by rfahey22 on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 12:09:45 AM EST

Re: Obama's poll numbers on the decline (2.00 / 2)

Look at me! i'm a selfish baby who's wounded pride will make me vote against my interest. I'm gonna hold my breath until 2012! I'm not an adult!! Wooo PUMA!


by heyhellowhatsnew on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 12:14:58 AM EST

Re: Obama's poll numbers on the decline (1.00 / 3)

Actually its McCain on the rise, not Obama on the decline.


by Bobby Obama on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 12:25:54 AM EST

Re: Obama's poll numbers on the decline (2.00 / 5)

His numbers will go down even further once you and Larry Johnson show by slow motion footage that Obama really did shoot Hillary that bird.  Then Larry Sinclair will take another polygraph and pass this time, proving that he in fact provided Obama sweet lovin' and crack.  Then Rezko's gonna turn on Obama and Obama will be indicted.  And then that Birth Certificate scandal that Texas Darlin's working so hard on over at No Quarter will turn up roses - proving that Obama is actually an illegitimate son of Saddam Hussein born in Sadr City.

Grandpa McCain will then have about a 50-50 chance.  


I like baked beans.
by SpideyDem on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 12:26:36 AM EST

Re: Obama's poll numbers on the decline (2.00 / 1)

And PUMA will still be a bunch of confused baboons.


by MeganLocke on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 03:40:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]

I have taken your concerns into account (2.00 / 3)

We have top men working on it now.


by libertyleft on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 12:31:23 AM EST

Re: Obama's poll numbers on the decline (2.00 / 2)

Well that didn't work. What else ya got?


Faced with the choice between changing one's mind and proving that there is no need to do so, almost everyone gets busy on the proof.
by jsfox on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 12:33:16 AM EST

Idiot. (1.75 / 4)

Try paying attention to something a little beefier than a daily tracking poll, you mouth-breathing doorknob:

From Five Thirty Eight:

From electoral-vote.com:
Obama 328   McCain 183   Ties 27

From Real Clear Politics:
Obama: 317
McCain: 221


by spunkmeyer on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 12:36:47 AM EST

Wow, somebody is getting sensitive (2.00 / 1)

If someone had told me a year ago, that today

--Gas would be $4 a gallon
--The economy would be dramatically worse, with the threat of both inflation and recession
--Bush's approval numbers would be in the low 20's

I would have predicted that the Democratic nominee would be preparing for his/her innauguration right now, not an election. The Gallup numbers should be worrisome to you.

And btw, you should lose the name-calling, and words like "idiot". A big part of politics--obviously lost on the Kerry's four years ago, as well as Barack and "Michelle" this time--is that you should try to be likeable.


by BJJ Fighter on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 12:50:07 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Wow, somebody is getting sensitive (2.00 / 2)

Spunkmeyer, you nasty, naughty boy.

Sincerely,

Larry Craig

The Gallup numbers are not worrisome in light of all of the information out there, including snapshot polls with much higher margins, state polling looking good, a huge enthusiasm advantage, and an anticipated large resource advantage.  I suspect folks like this diarist are "concerned" due to their own self-fulfilling prophecies of Obama being a poor candidate and not out of a candid analysis of the big picture.


I like baked beans.
by SpideyDem on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 12:56:10 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Hey, 2+2=5, if you want to believe it (1.20 / 5)

but that doesn't make it so.

To paraphrase Ronald Reagan, "I'm not saying Barack Obama is ignorant...it's just that he knows so much that isn't so!"


by BJJ Fighter on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 01:10:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hey, 2+2=5, if you want to believe it (1.75 / 4)

You are the purest of trolls.  Just a flat McCain supporter here to screw with us.  What part of my equation didn't add up?  

Good state polling - check (RCP, pollster.com, electoral-vote.com, MyDD map right in front of your goddamned face).

Good snapshot national polls - check - last two were +12 and +15.

Enthusiasm advantage - check - >60% of Obama supporters enthusiastically vote for Obama.  <40%
of McCain supporters do the same.

Resource advantage - check - Obama will significantly outraise $85 million + whatever McCain raises for the primary.  There are few who doubt this, and I am not among them.

What have you got to contest that besides grade school math equations pulled from your backside?


I like baked beans.
by SpideyDem on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 01:17:25 AM EST
[ Parent ]

More money he spends, worse he does (2.00 / 1)

Sorry dude, you guys are screwed. Obama outspent Clinton 5-1 in Texas, 4-1 in PA, 3-1 in OH....and still lost...by double-digit margins in PA and OH. The more people see his face, the more they dislike him. All those ads just turn people off...and the Obama people are just too politically correct to admit it. So the monetary advantage could be counter-productive. I would suggest the Obama folks use their money on a ground operation to get out the vote.

I think the last few months are what we call, "backing into the nomination". Once people have gotten to know him, they run the other way...check out how late deciders broke in all the key states.

btw, I didn't mention the margins in WV and KY...very worrisome for Obama.


by BJJ Fighter on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 01:37:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More money he spends, worse he does (2.00 / 1)

Weren't you the same guy who said that Powell would be McCain's running mate?  It's difficult for someone to serve as another's running mate if that person hasn't even endorsed the candidate yet; that would seem to be a hurdle, don't you think?


by Blazers Edge on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 01:40:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: More money he spends, worse he does (2.00 / 3)

"The more people see his face, the more they dislike him."

That would explain why Obama went into so many states with a 20+% disadvantage and was able to nearly tie or beat Clinton in so many of them.

For your sake, I hope your jiu jitsu is better than your logic.


And so, may evil beware and may good dress warmly and eat lots of fresh vegetables.
by thatpurplestuff on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 01:41:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

yeah, he went into CA up by 13 points (2.00 / 1)

Reuters-Zogby had him way ahead (49-36) on election eve, and she kicked his ass by double digits (happened in a lot of big states). So to your point, he went into several states, and uderperfomed the election eve polls.

I mean, actually, you should take off about 7-8 points from any of Obama's numbers, to get an accurate projection of where he'll end up.


by BJJ Fighter on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 01:47:41 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: yeah, he went into CA up by 13 points (2.00 / 2)

"Sen. Hillary Rodham Clinton's robust 25-point lead over Sen. Barack Obama in California has shrunk by nearly half since October - but state Democratic voters by a 3-1 ratio still believe the New York senator has the best chance of winning the presidency, a new Field Poll shows."

http://www.sfgate.com/cgi-bin/article.cg i?file=/c/a/2007/12/19/MN7HU0NJT.DTL& ;type=printable

She was up by 25% and ended up winning by 9% in California.  You just inadvertently disproved your own argument that people like Obama less the more they see him.  Nice one.


And so, may evil beware and may good dress warmly and eat lots of fresh vegetables.
by thatpurplestuff on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 02:04:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: yeah, he went into CA up by 13 points (none / 0)

If you're going to be citing facts and stuff, BJJ is not going to play with you.


by niksder on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 10:15:16 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Next time, try using AP, maybe USA Today.... (none / 0)

not sure "SFgate" carries a lot of weight.


by BJJ Fighter on Fri Jun 27, 2008 at 01:41:04 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: yeah, he went into CA up by 13 points (2.00 / 1)

I'm sorry, but did you just try to cite Zogby polling as evidence of something beside the fact that Zogby is a terrible pollster?  Seriously?  


John McCain: Healthcare for Kids? In America? No way
by bosdcla14 on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 02:35:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Hey, 2+2=5, if you want to believe it (2.00 / 3)

BJJ isn't a troll. He's an out and out McCain supporter just here to stir up trouble. He makes no attempt to be mistaken for a Dem. I don't think he could handle the thought of someone thinking he was a Dem.

Take it easy on the poor guy. It can't be easy being a Republican in the current political climate.


"The true measure of a man is how he treats someone who can do him absolutely no good." Samuel Johnson
by MS01 Indie on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 01:57:50 AM EST
[ Parent ]

BJ - can I call you BJ? (1.66 / 3)

If you don't know the difference between a single, low-sample, daily tracking poll and multi-state, weighted, averaged national electoral projections, you deserve to be called an idiot.

So, yeah, actually, let me say it again: you're an idiot.


by spunkmeyer on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 01:32:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Your answer sounds a little homophobic (2.00 / 1)

Some of us have lives beyond politics...BJJ stands for Brazilian Jiu Jitsu. I do submission grappling/cage fights as an avocation, after work and on the weekends. I don't know why you would want to address me as BJ.


by BJJ Fighter on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 01:42:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Your answer sounds a little homophobic (2.00 / 2)

"I do submission grappling/cage fights"

Translation:  I like to explore my masculinity by rolling around on the ground with other guys in my underwear.  My preferred position is on the bottom.


by Can I Haz Moar Snark on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 02:17:15 AM EST
[ Parent ]

ROTFLMAO! (2.00 / 1)

Oh, man.  I think I just hurt myself laughing!

BJ's comment has got to be snark!  It's pure genius!

Next week's meme:

"I do submission grappling/cage fights!"


by spunkmeyer on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 02:24:47 AM EST
[ Parent ]

All you people need to get out more (2.00 / 1)

There's a whole world outside of politics and the blogosphere...try to get some other interests.

Brazilian Jiu Jitsu is a form of MMA that is fairly commonplace. If you think there's something wierd or sexual about it, that is so about you....

While I'm sure that Spike TV doesn't fit the politically correct requirements of Obama-land, they do have UFC fights just about every other night; check it out.

And in the meantime, try to lose all the labelling and homophobic crap. Honestly, I'm what Barack would probably call, "just a typical white person!"


by BJJ Fighter on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 02:53:35 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Dude, you're so right. My bad. (2.00 / 1)


by spunkmeyer on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 03:57:19 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Your answer sounds a little homophobic (2.00 / 2)

Hey mixed martial arts is an awesome sport... this guy is just a horrible representative of the people that participate in it.


And so, may evil beware and may good dress warmly and eat lots of fresh vegetables.
by thatpurplestuff on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 02:25:43 AM EST
[ Parent ]

LOL! (2.00 / 3)

You're right, man.  I'm being too hard on the guy.  You know, he does make "submission grappling" sound pretty manly!

;D


by spunkmeyer on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 02:29:00 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: LOL! (2.00 / 2)

Haha anyone that feels the need to go by a fighting moniker on a freakin' blog, let alone a political blog deserves any ire that s/he receives.


And so, may evil beware and may good dress warmly and eat lots of fresh vegetables.
by thatpurplestuff on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 02:33:12 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Your answer sounds a little homophobic (2.00 / 3)

MMA isn't any less awesome than the ancient Greek Olympics, where men competed naked and greased-up.

I think it's just important to note that this McBlogger likes to roll around on the ground with sweaty, half-naked dudes.  In fact he loves it so much that he advertises it in his nickname.  

Maybe he thinks it makes him seem tougher or maybe it just helps him meet other guys who are into the same thing. I don't know.  I just thought I'd help spread the word.


by Can I Haz Moar Snark on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 02:35:49 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Best. Thread. Ever. :D (2.00 / 1)


by spunkmeyer on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 02:39:38 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Your answer sounds a little homophobic (2.00 / 1)

Just a little MMA trivia for you... Yoshihiro Akiyama actually intentionally greased himself up in his fight against Kazushi Sakuraba back in 2006 in order to defend against submissions, which is illegal.  He won the fight, but Sakuraba was complaining to the ref about how slippery he was.  He denied everything, but they had him on video applying lotion before the fight, so his win was declared a no-contest and his fight money revoked.  
True story.  :)
And so, may evil beware and may good dress warmly and eat lots of fresh vegetables.
by thatpurplestuff on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 02:46:21 AM EST
[ Parent ]

OMFG! My sides are hurting! (2.00 / 1)

Sakuraba was complaining to the ref about how slippery he was.

purple, I love you like an anonymous, greased-up brother, but this thread is going to do permanent damage to my ribcage if the innuendo keeps up like this!

;D


by spunkmeyer on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 02:50:33 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Your answer sounds a little homophobic (2.00 / 2)

I think our friend BJ BJJ Fighter likes the North-South position (just my hunch) and may not have objected as strenously as Sakuraba to a greasy "opponent".


by Can I Haz Moar Snark on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 02:55:22 AM EST
[ Parent ]

LOL! (2.00 / 2)

I do submission grappling/cage fights as an avocation.  I don't know why you would want to address me as BJ.

Dude, seriously - you can't throw out softballs like that.  Way too easy.  :D


by spunkmeyer on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 02:20:48 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's poll numbers on the decline (1.80 / 5)

The Following Users Have Recommended This Diary:
catfish2

You know it's bad when only bottom feeders will give you a rec.


"In the primary you should vote with your heart, but in the general, you should vote with your head" Hillary's husband
by venician on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 12:54:29 AM EST

what is the point of this diary? (2.00 / 3)

there is no analysis or commentary.


"Me Fail English? That's Unpossible." Ralph Wiggum
by canadian gal on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 01:24:49 AM EST

Re: Obama's poll numbers on the decline (2.00 / 1)

OMG Johnny McCain is only losing by 4!!! Yep, your guy is really rocking and rolling there. LOL


by animated on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 01:31:06 AM EST

Re: Obama's poll numbers on the decline (1.00 / 1)

Still here trying to bad mouth Obama I see.  I'd attempt to recite some of the comments from Hillary supporters from a couple months ago regarding polls but that would require more effort than I'm willing to invest on someone willing to vote McCain if she doesn't get her way.  Better to stomp your feet, jump around, throw your toys, stick out your tongue and get over it.  I'm sure there are some fine GOP sites to discuss how best to continue the Bush agenda for four more years.      


by Rick in Eugene on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 01:40:35 AM EST

Re: Obama's poll numbers on the decline (2.00 / 2)

Dumb diary. Next time don't just ask us to make your analysis for you.


If you're being chased by an angry bull and then you notice you're also being chased by a swarm of bees, it doesn't really change things. Just keep on running.
by vcalzone on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 01:44:29 AM EST

Re: Obama's poll numbers on the decline (none / 0)

poll numbers ebb & flow. All indicators show that Obama is in a very strong position. Not sure what our point is, but I can tell you, I'd much rather be us than them.


by Democrat in Chicago on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 01:51:03 AM EST

You're missing the point, entirely (2.00 / 1)

This is the worst year imaginable for the GOP...worse than Watergate, worse than 2006.

And the race in the Presidential contest is close.

We'll try one more time...slowly:

THE RACE BETWEEN THESE TWO CANDIDATES SHOULD NOT BE CLOSE. At this point, it should be a blowout, which offers a margin of safety, given that these contests invariably tighten up as you move toward election day.


by BJJ Fighter on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 01:56:11 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: You're missing the point, entirely (2.00 / 1)

Dude, it was close between Clinton and McCain as well before she departed from the race; so it's something that is unusual to Obama.


by Blazers Edge on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 01:58:42 AM EST
[ Parent ]

OMGZ!!!1!!!!!1! (2.00 / 1)

You're right! You're right!!! The election is already lost! We're doomed, doomed, doooooomed!!!


Grumpy, reluctant, sore-losing, unhappy, irritable Hillary supporter for Barack Obama 2008
by DemAC on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 02:43:33 AM EST

Re: OMGZ!!!1!!!!!1! (2.00 / 2)

What shall we do!?  What can we do!!!??? Poor, pooor us! We must desperately strike back immediately!!!



Grumpy, reluctant, sore-losing, unhappy, irritable Hillary supporter for Barack Obama 2008
by DemAC on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 02:47:14 AM EST
[ Parent ]

Re: Obama's poll numbers on the decline (2.00 / 1)

Obama holds 12-point lead over McCain, poll finds

According to a Times/Bloomberg Poll, 49% of registered voters favor Sen. Barack Obama while 37% support Sen. John McCain.
In a two-man contest, 49% of respondents favor Barack Obama, 37% John McCain. With Ralph Nader and Bob Barr added to the mix, Obama holds a 15-point edge.
On a four-man ballot that included independent candidate Ralph Nader and Libertarian Bob Barr, voters chose Obama over McCain by 48% to 33%.


http://www.latimes.com/news/politics/la- na-poll25-2008jun25,0,5763707.story

The race has remained very stable in recent weeks. Without leaners, Obama's support has stayed between 45% and 47% for fourteen straight days. With leaners, he has stayed between 48% and 50% for twenty straight days.

As for McCain, his support has been at 40% or 41% on eighteen of the last twenty-one days. Twice, he inched up a point above that range and once he slipped a point below.


http://rasmussenreports.com/public_conte nt/politics/election_20082/2008_presiden tial_election/daily_presidential_trackin g_poll

Among independents -- the group that usually determines election outcomes -- Obama leads 48%-36%.

http://www.usatoday.com/news/politics/el ection2008/2008-06-20-poll-friday_N.htm


by skohayes on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 06:43:31 AM EST

Re: Obama's poll numbers on the decline (none / 0)

McCain now +7 in MO:
http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollRepo rt.aspx?g=5d6f10cf-ec7e-4ef1-8abd-f798bb 64c79b
and +8 in Florida:
http://rasmussenreports.com/public_conte nt/politics/election_20082/2008_presiden tial_election/florida/election_2008_flor ida_presidential_election
and +1 in OH:
http://rasmussenreports.com/public_conte nt/politics/election_20082/2008_presiden tial_election/ohio/election_2008_ohio_pr esidential_election
and + 3 in NV:
http://rasmussenreports.com/public_conte nt/politics/election_20082/2008_presiden tial_election/nevada/election_2008_nevad a_presidential_election
and +16 in NE:
http://rasmussenreports.com/public_conte nt/politics/election_20082/2008_presiden tial_election/nebraska/nebraska_mccain_e xpands_lead_in_historically_red_state
and +13 in TX:
http://rasmussenreports.com/public_conte nt/politics/election_20082/state_topline s/texas/toplines_texas_presidential_elec tion_june_2_2008
only -2 in CO:
http://www.realclearpolitics.com/epolls/ 2008/president/co/colorado_mccain_vs_oba ma-546.html
only -1 in MN and IN:
http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollRepo rt.aspx?g=b9f93545-a19e-4e8d-909c-59b605 0c0d5e
http://www.surveyusa.com/client/PollRepo rt.aspx?g=d62471d9-b9f8-4274-8312-16c100 6a5764
McCain winning in MT,
and McCain winning in all 5 southern states where Obama won primary due racial vote: LA, AL, GA, MS, NC.

Point is that this list increasing in McCain's favor during last week.


Welcome to a Landslide without white Working class, Latinos, Women, Seniors and holding-on sweeties
by engels on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 09:51:08 AM EST

Re: Obama's poll numbers on the decline (2.00 / 1)

GASP!  McCain is winning in Nebraska!!!  Louisiana!!!  Alabama!!!  Texas!!!

ZOMG!!!

Welcome to a landslide without YOU.


John McCain wants to stay in Iraq.
by ihaveseenenough on Thu Jun 26, 2008 at 10:32:05 AM EST
[ Parent ]


You are not logged in.

In order to post a comment, you must be logged in. If you have a member account, please log in to comment.

If not, you can make an account right here. It's quick and free.

Login
Username:

Password: